[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11 planning

Peter Todd pete at petertodd.org
Tue Apr 28 13:42:38 UTC 2015

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:01:00AM -0700, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> As softforks almost certainly require backports to older releases and other
> software anyway, I don't think they should necessarily be bound to Bitcoin
> Core major releases. If they don't require large code changes, we can
> easily do them in minor releases too.

The code changes for absolute CLTV are quite small, and easily ported to
any Bitcoin Core version.

What's the oldest version you think we need backports for?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150428/f5b63150/attachment.sig>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list