[bitcoin-dev] What Lightning Is

Chris Pacia ctpacia at gmail.com
Sun Aug 9 21:40:49 UTC 2015

I'm glad Tom is bringing these points up. There seems to be an assumption
by many that LN will be automatically awesome by virtue of it being
technically feasible with having considered whether it is economically
feasible or desirable.

So much stock has been placed in LN as the solution to the block size
debate, yet it could turn out that it sucks in practice. Then what?
On Aug 9, 2015 5:27 PM, "Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Aug 9, 2015 11:54 AM, "Mark Friedenbach" <mark at friedenbach.org> wrote:
> > On the contrary the funds were advanced by the hub on the creation of
> the channel. There is no credit involved.
> That's a chuckle.
> As I said, nothing requires the hub to advance anything, and if it does,
> Bob can expect to pay for it.
> We'll see whether hubs assess a fee for depositing funds, whether the fee
> depends on the amount deposited, and whether it depends on the amount of
> time it stays there.
> I predict "all of the above." There is a name for these kinds of fees.
> Can you guess it?
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150809/db8043fc/attachment.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list