[bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for relative locktime
jtimon at jtimon.cc
Wed Aug 19 21:32:57 UTC 2015
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Joseph Poon <joseph at lightning.network> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:21:36AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim??n <
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
> I am also indifferent, but also dislike technical debt.
> It should maybe be noted for those who wish to do/write-code-for mempool
> transaction selection (irrespective of one's opinion on it) that lower
> is better, since transactions with shorter relative locks are
> transactions with "higher priority".
That policy code should be simple to change, but thank you for pointing it out.
Also thank you for declaring your position (indifference) on the subject.
More information about the bitcoin-dev