[bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not rising the block size

Ahmed Zsales ahmedzsales18 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 20 21:29:30 UTC 2015


For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer
you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade

Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases
sets a bad precedent

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on
>> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.
>> [...]
>> Here's the updated both-thread lists:
>> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb
> I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site
> attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the
> block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed.
> Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/
> Feedback welcome.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/31894e56/attachment.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list