[bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap

Jorge Timón jtimon at jtimon.cc
Mon Aug 24 02:27:02 UTC 2015

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 8/21/2015 5:01 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
>>> I checked the scenario where only the radio is on, and found the car
>>> does not crash.
>> Incidentally, what's your acceptable revenue difference between a small
>> (1% hashing power) and large (%30 hashing power) miner, all else being
>> equal? (remember that we shouldn't preclude variance reduction
>> techniques such as p2pool and pooled-solo mode)
>> Equally, what kind of attacks on miners do you think we need to be able to
>> resist? E.g. DoS attacks, hacking, etc.
> None of this is in the scope of Pieter's simulation.
> If you think that casts doubt on my conclusions, then it casts doubt on
> his original conclusions as well.

As far as I know, "his conclusions" were that there was an effect,
while suspending judgement on whether that effect was high enough to
be important for a given size or not.

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list