[bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork.

Jonathan Toomim j at toom.im
Wed Dec 30 15:00:16 UTC 2015

On Dec 30, 2015, at 6:19 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:

> Your fear is misplaced: it's trivial to avoid recursion with a bit of
> planning...

That makes some sense. I downgrade my emotions from "a future in which we have deployed a few generalized softforks this way sounds terrifying" to "the idea of a future in which we have deployed at least one generalized softfork this way gives me the heebie jeebies."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151230/5c219060/attachment.sig>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list