[bitcoin-dev] Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork.

joe2015 at openmailbox.org joe2015 at openmailbox.org
Thu Dec 31 11:32:20 UTC 2015

On 2015-12-31 18:39, David Chan wrote:
> The UTXO sets may diverge but they actually will be strict
> subsets/supersets of each other as no transaction would be invalid on
> one fork vs another unless the hard fork lasts longer than 100 blocks.

The UTXO sets can also diverge thanks to double spends, i.e. A->B is 
confirmed on the old chain and A->C is confirmed on the new.


More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list