[Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
lawrence at greenaddress.it
Thu Feb 12 16:15:03 UTC 2015
Mike Hearn <mike <at> plan99.net> writes:
> I know you will ignore this as usual, but the entire replace-by-fee folly
is based on your fundamental misunderstanding of miner incentives.
I disagree, I think it is inevitable (but then of course I'm probably biased
and why wouldn't I disagree given I run a service that allows for zero
confirmation/double spend protection with third party trust.)
Fixing it now avoids having people build on top of very weak/broken
foundations (see Coinbase https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-
wizards/msg/29818058/) which would cause bigger problems down the line.
One thing I don't understand from your position is how do you propose
handling transactions being stuck for days or longer because of low fees?
Even with floating fees you can have a sudden inflow of high fees
transactions taking over post broadcasting your transaction.
I also assume restricted replacement is very hard, especially from a UX point
of view and adds undue complexity
More information about the bitcoin-dev