[Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
pete at petertodd.org
Fri Feb 13 07:53:14 UTC 2015
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:13:33PM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> Where is the Specification section?? Does this support arbitrary scripts, or
> only the simplest CHECKMULTISIG case?
It might be enough to rewrite this BIP to basically say "all pubkeys
executed by all CHECKMULTISIG opcodes will be in the following canonical
order", followed by some explanatory examples of how to apply this
OTOH we don't yet have a standard way of even talking about arbitrary
scripts, so it may very well turn out to be the case that the above rule
is too restrictive in many cases - I certainly would not want to do a
soft-fork to enforce this, or even make it an IsStandard() rule.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the bitcoin-dev