[bitcoin-dev] Why not Child-Pays-For-Parent?
michabailey at gmail.com
Sat Jul 11 20:28:27 UTC 2015
Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are
evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for
relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol
doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol
message to signify that they should be evaluated together.
On Saturday, July 11, 2015, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> AFAIK the only thing holding it up is lack of unit tests. If anyone would
> to implement those, I expect it'd be merged fairly soon. Then the problem
> as Jeff mentioned, getting the parent transactions relayed despite failing
> relay policy on their own.
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev