[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary
karra.etc at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 17:30:08 UTC 2015
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev
> > Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money: that's the
> > system working as designed.
> The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that
> activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses
> from issues.
Is there any shred of evidence either of you can share to support your
claims on this pivotal point of interest to everyone here?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev