[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary

Sriram Karra karra.etc at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 17:30:08 UTC 2015

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev
> > Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money:   that's the
> > system working as designed.
> The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that
> activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses
> from issues.

Is there any shred of evidence either of you can share to support your
claims on this pivotal point of interest to everyone here?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150729/0f0bfde4/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list