[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary
thomas at thomaszander.se
Thu Jul 30 07:08:17 UTC 2015
On Wednesday 29. July 2015 20.00.10 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> And, of course, short term convenience for users is much more
> important than figuring out the long term viability of the system once
> the seigniorage (spent on the miner's subsidy) goes away.
There are various decades spanned in that sentence. Your idea of "short term"
is vastly different from mine.
More information about the bitcoin-dev