[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary

Thomas Zander thomas at thomaszander.se
Thu Jul 30 07:08:17 UTC 2015


On Wednesday 29. July 2015 20.00.10 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> And, of course, short term convenience for users is much more
> important than figuring out the long term viability of the system once
> the seigniorage (spent on the miner's subsidy) goes away.

There are various decades spanned in that sentence.  Your idea of "short term" 
is vastly different from mine.
-- 
Thomas Zander


More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list