[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary
milly at bitcoins.info
Fri Jul 31 03:18:15 UTC 2015
I have been looking up ways to measure decentralization at the moment.
There are some good discussions as they relate to Bitcoin but they are
scattered in different places. I just took over BitcoinStandards.com so
i thought about using that site to post stuff.
On 7/30/2015 9:25 PM, Raystonn wrote:
> Russ, do you have time to get started on your list? It would add value.
> On 30 Jul 2015 5:15 pm, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> These are the types of things I have been discussing in relation to a
> -A list of metrics
> -A Risk analysis of the baseline system. Bitcoin as it is now.
> -Mitigation strategies for each risk.
> -A set of goals.
> -A Road map for each goal that lists the changes or possible avenues to
> achieve that goal.
> Proposed changes would be measured against the same metrics and a risk
> analysis done so it can be compared with the baseline.
> For example, the block size debate would be discussed in the context of
> a road map related to a goal of increase scaling. One of the metrics
> would be a decentralization metric. (A framework for a
> metric is at
> Cost would be one aspect of the decentralization metric.
More information about the bitcoin-dev