[Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?

Peter Todd pete at petertodd.org
Wed Jun 10 19:20:04 UTC 2015

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
> Andy Schroder
> On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> >
> >>4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
> >>    the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client
> >>    doesn't verify them all.
> >What type of digital signatures specifically? What email client?
> I think they are usually PGP/MIME signatures that are not working
> right. If you'll notice from my e-mail headers:
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6

It might be that Thunderbird doesn't properly handle messages with both
signed and unsigned content. I use mutt myself, which handles it just
fine. (the sigs on your emails verify just fine for instance)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150610/d87cbc4a/attachment.sig>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list