[Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork

Mark Friedenbach mark at friedenbach.org
Tue Jun 16 00:41:00 UTC 2015


On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wasn't the XT hard fork proposed as a last resort, should the bitcoin-core
> maintainers simply refuse to lift the 1Mb limit? No one wants to go that
> route. An alternate hard-fork proposal like BIP100 that gets consensus, or
> a modified version of gavin's that ups the limit to 8Mb instead of 20Mb, or
> hell even some major changes to the non-consunsus code to make it
> adequately handle the situation when blocks fill up, and allow wallet
> software to continue working with a send-and-forget use pattern, any of
> these would be enough to avoid the need for an XT only hard-fork.
>
> So far BIP100 is the only one that seems to actually be getting any sort
> of momentum toward consensus, and it was proposed... 2 days ago? When the
> XT fork was proposed as a last resort, it was when the opponents were (to
> my understanding) suggesting we just let blocks fill up, and hopefully
> things would just work out on their own.
>

We are not reaching consensus about any proposal, Garzik's or otherwise.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150615/8ccbaeef/attachment.html>


More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list