[Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers
Wladimir J. van der Laan
laanwj at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 11:47:59 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:00:17PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > Core is in the weird position where there's no decision making ability at
> > all, because anyone who shows up and shouts enough can generate
> > 'controversy', then Wladimir sees there is disagreement and won't touch the
> > issue in question. So it just runs and runs and *anyone* with commit access
> > can then block any change.
And allegations that the project is "run like wikipedia" or "an edit war" are verifyably untrue.
Check the commit history.
How many reverts do you see? How many of those do you see that are not simply to get rid of unexpected bugs, to be re-merged later?
Not much more than two, in ~5500 commit over six years. I feel sorry for you that `getutxos` was rejected in a messy way, still you are so held up about it and keep repeating it as if it is a daily occurence. Disingenuous, at the least.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bitcoin-dev