June 2015 Archives by thread
Starting: Mon Jun 1 00:03:36 UTC 2015
Ending: Tue Jun 30 23:45:09 UTC 2015
Messages: 893
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Pindar Wong
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Alex Mizrahi
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Ricardo Filipe
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
Jérôme Legoupil
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Gavin Andresen
- [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal
Potter QQ
- [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks)
Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] Why do we need a MAX_BLOCK_SIZE at all?
Jim Phillips
- [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extensionblocks)
Raystonn .
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate
Mats Henricson
- [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers
Mark Friedenbach
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
cipher anthem
- [Bitcoin-development] DevCore London
Mike Hearn
- [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure
Matt Whitlock
- [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure
Stephen Morse
- [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure
Stephen Morse
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16
Ron
- [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin}
Sven Berg
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11.0 release candidate 1 available
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs
Kristov Atlas
- [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions
Rusty Russell
- [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment
Kalle Rosenbaum
- [Bitcoin-development] BIP for PoP URI scheme
Kalle Rosenbaum
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Experiment Underway
Tom Harding
- [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit
Raystonn .
- [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit
Raystonn .
- [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers
Rusty Russell
- [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?
xor
- [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee patch against Bitcoin Core v0.10.2
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism
Nathan Wilcox
- [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?
Andy Schroder
- [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?
Troy Benjegerdes
- [Bitcoin-development] Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Bip 32 Question
James Poole
- [Bitcoin-development] Various block size proposals
Bryan Bishop
- [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees
Eric Lombrozo
- [Bitcoin-development] Address Expiration to Prevent Reuse
odinn
- [Bitcoin-development] The timechain: an idea to solve TX malleability in smart contract protocols without requiring a fork.
Matthew Roberts
- [Bitcoin-development] The timechain: an idea to solve TX malleability in smart contract protocols with minimal involvement and without requiring a fork.
Matthew Roberts
- [Bitcoin-development] Scaling Bitcoin with Subchains
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity
Warren Togami Jr.
- [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100
Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] Test
Jakub Lacko
- [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market
Kevin Greene
- [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Reusable payment codes
odinn
- [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas
Gregory Maxwell
- [Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas
Justus Ranvier
- [Bitcoin-development] Scope narrowing for proposals to address block size limit debate, an inquiry
odinn
- [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers
odinn
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11.0 release candidate 2 available
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [Bitcoin-development] Video summarizations of blocksize issues?
grarpamp
- [Bitcoin-development] Ninki Wallet view on blocksize debate
Team Ninki
- [Bitcoin-development] FYI - Mailing List Move Preparations
Warren Togami Jr.
- [Bitcoin-development] improving development model (Re: Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers
Dr Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] Mailman incompatibility with DKIM ...
Warren Togami Jr.
- [Bitcoin-development] F2Pool has enabled full replace-by-fee
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Fee Market Effects
Tim Witters
- [Bitcoin-development] improving development model (Re: Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers
Eric Lombrozo
- [Bitcoin-development] Alternate HD path structure: BIP, blog, or wat?
Matt Smith
- [Bitcoin-development] IMPORTANT - Bitcoin Dev List Move Tuesday, June 23rd 8pm UTC
Warren Togami Jr.
- [Bitcoin-development] Hard fork via miner vote
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks)
Jorge Timón
- [Bitcoin-development] Membership disabled due to bounces
Braun Brelin
- [Bitcoin-development] Question regarding transactions with NLOCKTIME > 0
Braun Brelin
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Re: [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions
Jorge Timón
- [Bitcoin-development] confirm 1e595b258d48a8badd07523cbd8a8d74c150803c
Warren Togami Jr.
- [Bitcoin-development] Membership disabled due to bounces
Warren Togami Jr.
- [Bitcoin-development] Emergency List Move: Sunday, June 21st, 2015 at 9pm UTC
Warren Togami Jr.
- [bitcoin-dev] Welcome to the new Bitcoin Dev List
Warren Togami Jr.
- [bitcoin-dev] new thread posting something else
s7r
- [bitcoin-dev] test
Warren Togami Jr.
- [bitcoin-dev] test #2
Warren Togami Jr.
- [bitcoin-dev] Test
Eric Lombrozo
- [bitcoin-dev] test #3
Warren Togami Jr.
- [bitcoin-dev] Just FYI
Frank Flores
- [bitcoin-dev] test post
Nathan Wilcox
- [bitcoin-dev] Test
Johnathan Corgan
- [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
Gavin Andresen
- [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
Jean-Paul Kogelman
- [bitcoin-dev] test post
Daniel Wilczynski
- [bitcoin-dev] [RFC] IBLT block testing implementation
Rusty Russell
- [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
Ross Nicoll
- [bitcoin-dev] game-theory, miner incentive alignment vs current proposals
Adam Back
- [bitcoin-dev] Mempool size consensus + dynamic block size re-targetting
Filipe Farinha
- [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] New GPG signing key for Bitcoin Core binary releases
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] Announcing Individual User Accounts at statoshi.info
Jameson Lopp
- [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process and Votes
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process and Votes
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process and Votes
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process and Votes
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] BIP65 / CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY deployment
Peter Todd
- [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
Pieter Wuille
- [bitcoin-dev] Upcoming DOS vulnerability announcements for Bitcoin Core
Gregory Maxwell
- [bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit
Michael Naber
- [bitcoin-dev] Block Size Debate Analogy / Workaround: Bitcoin is Like Windows 3.11
will binns
- [bitcoin-dev] Upcoming DOS vulnerability announcements for Bitcoin Core
Thomas Pryds
- [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives, Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc
grarpamp
- [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives, Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc
Jeff Garzik
- [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives, Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc
Andy Schroder
- [bitcoin-dev] Outroduction of old non-updated full nodes through graceful degradation to SPV mode
Natanael
- [bitcoin-dev] Original Vision
Santino Napolitano
- [bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit
Raystonn
- [bitcoin-dev] TXO + STXO vs UTXO Re: Original Vision
Jorge Timón
- [bitcoin-dev] Tree Chains
Andy Schroder
- [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployment schedule
Peter Todd
- [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core: The globally aware global consensus network
Michael Naber
- [bitcoin-dev] Block size increase oppositionists: please clearly define what you need done to increase block size to a static 8MB, and help do it
Michael Naber
- [bitcoin-dev] RFC: HD Bitmessage address derivation based on BIP-43
Justus Ranvier
- [bitcoin-dev] block-size tradeoffs & hypothetical alternatives (Re: Block size increase oppositionists: please clearly define what you need done to increase block size to a static 8MB, and help do it)
Adam Back
- [bitcoin-dev] A possible solution for the block size limit: Detection and rejection of bloated blocks by full nodes.
Peter Grigor
Last message date:
Tue Jun 30 23:45:09 UTC 2015
Archived on: Tue Jun 30 23:45:13 UTC 2015
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).