May 2015 Archives by thread
Starting: Fri May 1 22:57:55 UTC 2015
Ending: Sun May 31 23:58:13 UTC 2015
Messages: 544
- [Bitcoin-development] [ANN] METAmarket - Trustless Federated Marketplaces
Marc D. Wood
- [Bitcoin-development] Relative CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY (was CLTV proposal)
Matt Corallo
- [Bitcoin-development] New release of replace-by-fee for Bitcoin Core v0.10.1
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] CLTV opcode allocation; long-term plans?
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Matt Corallo
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Matt Corallo
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
John Bodeen
- [Bitcoin-development] CLTV opcode allocation; long-term plans?
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase
Gavin Andresen
- [Bitcoin-development] Mechanics of a hard fork
Roy Badami
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
Matt Corallo
- [Bitcoin-development] Solution for Block Size Increase
Nicolas DORIER
- [Bitcoin-development] Assurance contracts to fund the network with OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
Tier Nolan
- [Bitcoin-development] Solution for Block Size Increase
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] Suggestion: Dynamic block size that updates like difficulty
Michael Naber
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Matt Whitlock
- [Bitcoin-development] Removing transaction data from blocks
Arne Brutschy
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Steven Pine
- [Bitcoin-development] Softfork signaling improvements
Douglas Roark
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Raystonn .
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase (Raystonn)
Damian Gomez
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Damian Gomez
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Andrew
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Jim Phillips
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Andreas Schildbach
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Matt Whitlock
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Bob McElrath
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Danny Thorpe
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Mike Hearn
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Mike Hearn
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Danny Thorpe
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Allen Piscitello
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Aaron Voisine
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Matt Whitlock
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
joliver at airmail.cc
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Mark Friedenbach
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
s7r
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
s7r
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Jeff Garzik
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Jim Phillips
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] A way to create a fee market even without a block size limit (2013)
Sergio Lerner
- [Bitcoin-development] Reducing the block rate instead of increasing the maximum block size
Sergio Lerner
- [Bitcoin-development] Reducing the block rate instead of increasing the maximum block size
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] Reducing the block rate instead of increasing the maximum block size
insecurity at national.shitposting.agency
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Bitcoin core 0.11 planning
Wladimir
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11 planning
Wladimir
- [Bitcoin-development] Long-term mining incentives
Thomas Voegtlin
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 62
Damian Gomez
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 63
Damian Gomez
- [Bitcoin-development] simplified costing analysis
gb
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin transaction
Telephone Lemien
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin transaction
Telephone Lemien
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed additional options for pruned nodes
gabe appleton
- [Bitcoin-development] Long-term mining incentives
Gavin Andresen
- [Bitcoin-development] Reducing the block rate instead of increasing the maximum block size
Sergio Lerner
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Proposed additional options for pruned nodes
Adam Weiss
- [Bitcoin-development] [BIP] Normalized Transaction IDs
Christian Decker
- [Bitcoin-development] Long-term mining incentives
Damian Gomez
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.1 release candidate 2 available
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.2 release candidate 1 available
Wladimir
- [Bitcoin-development] No Bitcoin For You
Tom Harding
- [Bitcoin-development] Long-term mining incentives
Michael Jensen
- [Bitcoin-development] Open Bitcoin Privacy Project Spring 2015 Report
Justus Ranvier
- [Bitcoin-development] Open Bitcoin Privacy Project Spring 2015 Report
Justus Ranvier
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 release candidate 1 tagged
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.2 released
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Consensus Forking Behavior Introduced in Bitcoin Core in May 2014
Dave Collins
- [Bitcoin-development] ChainDB Whitepaper
Eric Martindale
- [Bitcoin-development] Scaling Bitcoin with Subchains
Andrew
- [Bitcoin-development] Virtual Notary.
Emin Gün Sirer
- [Bitcoin-development] Virtual Notary.
Jonas Schnelli
- [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Thomas Kerin
- [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Eric Lombrozo
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 released
Wladimir J. van der Laan
- [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment BIP-able?
Kalle Rosenbaum
- [Bitcoin-development] alternatives to the 20MB block limit, measure first!
Ron
- [Bitcoin-development] No Bitcoin For You
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] No Bitcoin For You
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] No Bitcoin For You
Thy Shizzle
- [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery
Jim Phillips
- [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee
Peter Todd
- [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Survey Paper
Florian Tschorsch
- [Bitcoin-development] please remove me from the list
Da Xu
- [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal
Pieter Wuille
- [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers
Mark Friedenbach
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Steven Pine
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Steven Pine
- [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction
Adam Back
- [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
Matt Corallo
- [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
Raystonn
- [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: A measured response to save Bitcoin Core
Matt Whitlock
- [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
Chun Wang
- [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure
Stephen Morse
Last message date:
Sun May 31 23:58:13 UTC 2015
Archived on: Sun Jun 21 21:19:11 UTC 2015
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).