[bitcoin-dev] Contradiction in BIP65 text?

xor xor at freenetproject.org
Sat Nov 14 22:47:23 UTC 2015

On Friday, November 13, 2015 06:58:07 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This clearly says that funds can be frozen.
> > Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?
> This language definitely trips up or worries several folks - it's been
> mentioned a few times before.
> The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds.  It is not an unwilling act
> of force, which many assume when they see the phrase "freeze funds."

Oh, interesting, albeit that was not subject of my question.

My question in fact was whether *I* can use it to freeze *my* funds; because I 
think that would be an interesting feature for various purposes.
From the state of BIP65 I talked about, it is not even clear whether that is 

Your observation beyond that is a valid concern though.
So both should be addressed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151114/d16fea08/attachment.sig>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list