[bitcoin-dev] Hash of UTXO set as consensus-critical

[Justus Ranvier]

On 19/09/15 10:45, Rune Kjær Svendsen wrote:
> We need to distinguish between two different things here:
> 
> 1) A 51% attack, where the majority of mining power is *malicious* (hence “attack”)

What does "malicious" mean?

In other words, If miner A is mining honestly, and miner B is mining
maliciously, what are some of the possible difference in their behaviour
we would observe?


-- 
Justus Ranvier
Open Bitcoin Privacy Project
http://www.openbitcoinprivacyproject.org/
justus at openbitcoinprivacyproject.org
E7AD 8215 8497 3673 6D9E 61C4 2A5F DA70 EAD9 E623
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xEAD9E623.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 18442 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150919/c934b9de/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150919/c934b9de/attachment-0001.sig>