[bitcoin-dev] Interpreting nTime for the purpose of Bitcoin-attested timestamps
tomh at thinlink.com
Mon Sep 19 19:53:46 UTC 2016
On 9/19/2016 10:56 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> I should state that assumption more clearly.
Glad to get you thinking, and I need to change my suggestion. The
catch-up formula is not applicable because it doesn't limit how long the
dishonest miners have to catch up.
Instead you want the probability that the honest miners can build a
chain N blocks long before the dishonest miners do the same, which is
CDF[Erlang(N, q) - Erlang(N, 1 - q), 0]
I have some apparatus for doing this numerically without simulation if
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the bitcoin-dev