[bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Generalized version bits voting (bip-genvbvoting)

Tom Zander tomz at freedommail.ch
Wed Apr 5 10:08:51 UTC 2017

On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 20:01:51 CEST Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 9 provides a mechanism for having
> miners coordinate softforks because they can make the upgrade process
> smoother this way. But the same is not true of hardforks: miners are
> essentially irrelevant to them, and cannot make the process any smoother.

Can you explain how miners are irrelevant if the upgrade is not a soft fork?

Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list