[bitcoin-dev] BIP-21 amendment proposal: -no125

CryptAxe cryptaxe at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 20:06:31 UTC 2017

On Dec 5, 2017 12:00 PM, "Sjors Provoost" <sjors at sprovoost.nl> wrote:


I don't think all BIPs lend themselves to this pattern. Can you think of
another example?

Not right now, just seemed like a good idea to consider making it useful
for more than one thing (maybe CT or something else could use it in the

I also suspect each ignored flag requires carefully defined behavior, so
it's probably better to spell that out in the BIP.


Agreed, no reason they couldn't reuse the same section of the payment
request URI though. (And define that behavior in the BIP)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20171205/f2230fff/attachment.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list