[bitcoin-dev] A Better MMR Definition

Bram Cohen bram at bittorrent.com
Fri Feb 24 02:50:10 UTC 2017

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:

> I think you've misunderstood what TXO commitments are. From my article:
> "A merkle tree committing to the state of all transaction outputs, both
> spent
> and unspent, can provide a method of compactly proving the current state
> of an
> output."
> -https://petertodd.org/2016/delayed-txo-commitments#txo-commitments:

The proposal on that page is of a tree which does require random access
updates, it just positions entries in the order they happened to be added
instead of sorting by their hash. Once you start updating it to indicate
spent status all the exact same issues of TXO size and cache coherence on
updates show up again, but now you're using a more complex bespoke data
structure instead of a basic fundamental one.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170223/e1b6fe16/attachment.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list