[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released

Chris Priest cp368202 at ohiou.edu
Sun Jan 8 01:58:27 UTC 2017

Its too bad you're not the one who decides what gets posted here or
not. If you don't like whats being discussed, then don't open those

On 1/7/17, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
> bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
> taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
> contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
> for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
> Much appreciated. Thanks.
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
>> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
>> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
>> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
>> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>> e
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list