[bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable

[Tao Effect]

> You keep referring to 148 coinbase coins, what is the rationale behind this? Why would you prefer using 148 coinbases over legacy coinbases for this purpose?

OK, maybe "post-UASF coinbase coins" is a better term? I just wanted to make it clear that this refers to coins that come from blocks generated after the UASF is activated.

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Kekcoin <kekcoin at protonmail.com <mailto:kekcoin at protonmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> You keep referring to 148 coinbase coins, what is the rationale behind this? Why would you prefer using 148 coinbases over legacy coinbases for this purpose?
> 
> 
> Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com/> Secure Email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/e69fcaa4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/e69fcaa4/attachment-0001.sig>