[bitcoin-dev] Introducing a POW through a soft-fork
truthcoin at gmail.com
Mon Nov 6 20:30:30 UTC 2017
+1 to all of Peter Todd's comments
On Nov 6, 2017 11:50 AM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 05:48:27AM +0000, Devrandom via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Some quick thoughts...
> > Hi all,
> > Feedback is welcome on the draft below. In particular, I want to see if
> > there is interest in further development of the idea and also interested
> > any attack vectors or undesirable dynamics.
> > (Formatted version available here:
> > https://github.com/devrandom/btc-papers/blob/master/aux-pow.md )
> > # Soft-fork Introduction of a New POW
> First of all, I don't think you can really call this a soft-fork; I'd call
> it a
> My reasoning being that after implementation, a chain with less total work
> the main chain - but more total SHA256^2 work than the main chain - might
> followed by non-supporting clients. It's got some properties of a
> but it's security model is definitely different.
> > ### Aux POW intermediate block
> > Auxiliary POW blocks are introduced between normal blocks - i.e. the
> > alternates between the two POWs.
> > Each aux-POW block points to the previous normal block and contains
> > transactions just like a normal block.
> > Each normal block points to the previous aux-POW block and must contain
> > transactions from the aux-POW block.
> Note how you're basically proposing for the block interval to be decreased,
> which has security implications due to increased orphan rates.
> > ### Heaviest chain rule change
> > This is a semi-hard change, because non-upgraded nodes can get on the
> > chain in case of attack. However,
> Exactly! Not really a soft-fork.
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev