[bitcoin-dev] Schnorr and taproot (etc) upgrade
roconnor at blockstream.io
Tue Dec 18 03:18:40 UTC 2018
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:16 PM Johnson Lau <jl2012 at xbt.hk> wrote:
> I proposed the same in BIP114. I wish Satoshi had designed that way.
Thanks. I probably read that and internalized it and forgot you wrote it.
> But I’m not sure if that would do more harm than good. For example, people
> might lose money by copying an existing script template. But they might
> also lose money in the same way as CHECKMULTISIG is disabled. So I’m not
> Another related thing I’d like to bikeshed is to pop the stack after
> OP_CLTV and OP_CSV. The same pros and cons apply.
This one is almost a no-brainer I think. Nearly every instance of OP_CSV
is followed by an OP_DROP and we'd save 1 WU per OP_CSV if we pop the stack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev