February 2018 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Feb 1 01:14:45 UTC 2018
Ending: Wed Feb 28 23:36:05 UTC 2018
Messages: 99

• [bitcoin-dev] New Bitcoin Core macOS signing key   Cory Fields
• [bitcoin-dev] RBF Wallet Algorithms (Was: Transaction Merging (bip125 relaxation))   ZmnSCPxj
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Gregory Maxwell
• [bitcoin-dev] Taproot: Privacy preserving switchable scripting   ZmnSCPxj
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Ryan Grant
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Gregory Maxwell
• [bitcoin-dev] NIST 8202 Blockchain Technology Overview   CANNON
• [bitcoin-dev] NIST 8202 Blockchain Technology Overview   Damian Williamson
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP0008 clarification   Helder Garcia
• [bitcoin-dev] Electrum Personal Server alpha release   Chris Belcher
• [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: [Lightning-dev] AMP: Atomic Multi-Path Payments over Lightning   Bryan Bishop
• [bitcoin-dev] Electrum Personal Server alpha release   Jonas Schnelli
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Jeremy
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Jeremy
• [bitcoin-dev] Setting up bitcoin dev environment ( bitcoind, bitcoin-cli )   Maksim Solovjov
• [bitcoin-dev] [BIP] Stratum protocol specification   Jules Lamur
• [bitcoin-dev] Setting up bitcoin dev environment ( bitcoind, bitcoin-cli )   Bernd Jendrissek
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tristan Hoy
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Russell O'Connor
• [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward   Melvin Carvalho
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   rhavar at protonmail.com
• [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward   rhavar at protonmail.com
• [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward   Peter Todd
• [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward   Christian Decker
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tristan Hoy
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Peter Todd
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Russell O'Connor
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   rhavar at protonmail.com
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Peter Todd
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Russell O'Connor
• [bitcoin-dev] [BIP] Stratum protocol specification   Sergio Demian Lerner
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP0008 clarification   ZmnSCPxj
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tristan Hoy
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   JOSE FEMENIAS CAÑUELO
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Natanael
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Aymeric Vitte
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Jameson Lopp
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Brian Lockhart
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Aymeric Vitte
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Jameson Lopp
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Bedri Ozgur Guler
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Patrick Murck
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Adam Ficsor
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Felix Wolfsteller
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Daniel Robinson
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Luke Dashjr
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Peter Todd
• [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward   Peter Todd
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Cory Fields
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   CryptAxe
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   rhavar at protonmail.com
• [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license   Damian Williamson
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Russell O'Connor
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Greg Sanders
• [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments   Marco Falke
• [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments   Luke Dashjr
• [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments   Gregory Maxwell
• [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments   Eric Voskuil
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Natanael
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Natanael
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Natanael
• [bitcoin-dev] Transition to post-quantum   Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoin-dev] Alternative way to count sigops   Johnson Lau
• [bitcoin-dev] Alternative way to count sigops   Gregory Maxwell
• [bitcoin-dev] NIST 8202 Blockchain Technology Overview   CANNON
• [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to just witness data?   CANNON
• [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to just witness data?   Austin Maier
• [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to just witness data?   rhavar at protonmail.com
• [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to just witness data?   Eric Voskuil
• [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments   Marco Falke
• [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to just witness data?   rhavar at protonmail.com
• [bitcoin-dev] Increased blockspace enabled by SegWit limited to just witness data?   Eric Voskuil
• [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW   Tao Effect
• [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW   Ryan J Martin
• [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW   Tao Effect
• [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW   Damian Williamson
• [bitcoin-dev] Built in encryption   Ilan Oh
• [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW   Daniele Pinna
• [bitcoin-dev] Built in encryption   Lucas Clemente Vella
• [bitcoin-dev] Multi CSV Transaction   Praveen Baratam
• [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: [Lightning-dev] Post-Schnorr lightning txes   Bryan Bishop
• [bitcoin-dev] Multi CSV Transaction   Daniel Robinson
• [bitcoin-dev] Multi CSV Transaction   Praveen Baratam
• [bitcoin-dev] Amend the BIP 123 process to include buried deployments   Eric Voskuil
• [bitcoin-dev] Some thoughts on removing timestamps in PoW   Tao Effect
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Ryan Grant
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Daniel Edgecumbe
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP Activation Reference   Damian Williamson
• [bitcoin-dev] Graftroot: Private and efficient surrogate scripts under the taproot assumption   Gregory Maxwell
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.16.0 released   Wladimir J. van der Laan
• [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting BIP 125 RBF policy.   Russell O'Connor
• [bitcoin-dev] Simple lock/unlock mechanism   アルム　カールヨハン
• [bitcoin-dev] Simple lock/unlock mechanism   アルム　カールヨハン
• [bitcoin-dev] Simple lock/unlock mechanism   Anthony Towns
• [bitcoin-dev] Simple lock/unlock mechanism   Adam Back

Last message date: Wed Feb 28 23:36:05 UTC 2018
Archived on: Wed Feb 28 23:36:08 UTC 2018

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...