[bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH2 for version 1 witness programme
roconnor at blockstream.io
Fri Jun 1 15:03:46 UTC 2018
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Double SHA256 of the serialization of:
Should we replace the Double SHA256 with a Single SHA256? There is no
possible length extension attack here. Or are we speculating that there is
a robustness of Double SHA256 in the presence of SHA256 breaking?
I suggest putting `sigversion` at the beginning instead of the end of the
format. Because its value is constant, the beginning of the SHA-256
computation could be pre-computed in advance. Furthermore, if we make the
`sigversion` exactly 64-bytes long then the entire first block of the
SHA-256 compression function could be pre-computed.
Can we add CHECKSIGFROMSTACK or do you think that would go into a separate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev