[bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH2 for version 1 witness programme

Johnson Lau jl2012 at xbt.hk
Fri Jun 1 18:45:57 UTC 2018

> On 2 Jun 2018, at 2:15 AM, Russell O'Connor <roconnor at blockstream.io> wrote:
> I prefer a different opcode for CHECKSIGFROMSTACK because I dislike opcodes that pop a non-static number of elements off the stack.  Popping a dynamic number of stack elements makes it more difficult to validate that a Script pubkey doesn't allow any funny business.

Agreed. This is one of the reasons I think we should remove CHECKMULTISIG in the new script system
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180602/9d05b74e/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list