[bitcoin-dev] Multi party Schnorr Rust implementation
c1.bitcoin at niftybox.net
Wed Nov 28 06:33:30 UTC 2018
Are there any candidates for non-interactive threshold signatures?
Interactive signatures are not very suitable for air-gapped use cases.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:18 AM Omer Shlomovits via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am working for the past few months with collaborators (in cc) on
> providing Rust reference implementations to existing multi party schemes
> for Schnorr signatures . This includes aggregated signatures,
> accountable signatures (which for n out of n are multi-signatures) and
> threshold signatures (wip).
> The project can be found here:
> https://github.com/KZen-networks/multi-party-schnorr .
> We aim that if the protocol is run in a configuration of a single party it
> will be bip-schnorr  compliant.
> Hope you'll find it useful :)
> Questions, suggestions and pull requests are welcome!
>  https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/bip-schnorr/bip-schnorr.mediawiki
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev