[bitcoin-dev] March 23rd 2021 Taproot Activation Meeting Notes
jlrubin at mit.edu
Wed Mar 24 03:46:54 UTC 2021
We had a very productive meeting today. Here is a summary of the meeting --
I've done my best to
summarize in an unbiased way. Thank you to everyone who attended.
1. On the use of a speedy trial variant:
- There are no new objections to speedy trial generally.
- There is desire to know if Rusty retracts or reaffirms his NACK in light
of the responses.
- There is an open question of if Rusty's NACK remains if it is
- There is no desire to wait for Rusty's response if he does not respond
(but please don't leave us in suspense).
2. Selecting between heights and MTP:
- There is not robust consensus on either
- There are two NACKs, one (luke-jr) against MTP, one (jeremyrubin) against
height. More on this in
agenda item 5.
- No one has an issue with the technical safety of MTP/heights on their own.
- There is an open question of the additional review required to ensure
height based activation is
3. Parameter Selection
- There is broad agreement that we should target something like a May 1st
release, with 1 week from rc1
starttime/startheight, and 3 months + delta stoptime/stopheight (6
retargetting periods), and an
activation time of around Nov 15th.
- If we select heights, it looks like the first signalling period would be
683424, the stop height
would be 695520.
- If we select times, we should target a mid-period MTP. We can shift this
closer to release, but
currently it looks like a 1300 UTC May 7th start time and stop time would
be 1300 UTC August 13th.
- The activation height should be 707616 (about Nov 15th) for either
(please check my math, if anyone is superstitious we can add a day to
4. Parameter Flexibility
- We may wish to adjust the schedule a little bit -- either back 1 signal,
or up 1 signal.
- There's concurrence that regardless of pushing the start or stop dates,
we should hold the
November 15th date steady as slipping past Thanksgiving turns to Christmas
turns to New Years
turns to Chinese New Year and we're looking at March as the next date
people would want to
- There's concurrence that as long as we're getting to a release sometime
in May (with a very strong
preference for Mid-May as opposed to End of May) that we don't need to
limited belief that we could stretch this into June if needed.
- There's belief that we should be able to get a release with ST Taproot on
the timeline suggested
by topic 3.
5. Simultaneous UASF*
- luke-jr believes that a UASF client must be able to release before the ST
client releases in
order for people to use it
- no one else in attendance seemed to share this sentiment, a UASF can
proceed independently of ST.
- UASF is compatible with a MTP based ST by selecting whatever height the
ST MTP started at
(and a stop height farther in the future with LOT).
- luke-jr NACK of ST MTP: ST with MTP means that UASF must release after ST
releases, which limits
- jeremyrubin NACK of ST Height: if using height means that we'd see a
marketed push to launch a
UASF client before ST is given a chance, ST fails its goal for avoiding
* For the avoidance of doubt, theUASF client would include logic to be
compatible with ST's minimum
activation height and may be variously called a "UASF", "BIP8 LOT=true w/
minactiveheight for ST
compatibility", "ST + BIP8", or some other combination of phrases in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev