[Bitcoin-ml] Can we decide on a roadmap now?
deadalnix at gmail.com
Fri Sep 1 19:31:45 UTC 2017
2017-09-01 20:51 GMT+02:00 Nagai via bitcoin-ml <
bitcoin-ml at lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> Bitcoin Cash needs a roadmap. When will we hard fork? What will hard forks
> bring us?
> ... No answers
> Less information = less trust.
> If we don't have a roadmap, no one will believe in Bitcoin Cash. We need
> to sort these things:
> Simple malleability fix / FlexTrans
Wallets are catching up. It makes no sense to break them now. This will be
fixed in time.
> Remove OP_RETURN anti-replay rule
It already has a sunset clause.
> Better difficulty adjustment
> Headers-first mining (Can you believe that this is a part of Bitcoin
> Classic's 2016 roadmap?)
Pool software do that already today. It is not useful.
> Dynamic blocksize
Yes, this is important.
> Schnorr signatures
> Blockchain pruning (Can be optional, each node operator decides)
All Cash client can do pruning today.
> Removing Asicboost (Least priority?)
Nobody cares about ASICboost.
> Forcing XThin / Compact Blocks
This is not really consensus related.
> Some inspired by: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/
> Can't we at least decide when will the first hard fork happen and what
> will it contain?
That's being decided now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-ml