[Bitcoin-ml] Can we decide on a roadmap now?

Jan Nightingale turifex at protonmail.ch
Sat Sep 2 23:11:49 UTC 2017


>Schnorr signatures

Can I ask why?
The difference is imo cosmetic

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Bitcoin-ml] Can we decide on a roadmap now?
> Local Time: September 1, 2017 8:51 PM
> UTC Time: September 1, 2017 6:51 PM
> From: bitcoin-ml at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> To: bitcoin-ml at lists.linuxfoundation.org <bitcoin-ml at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Bitcoin Cash needs a roadmap. When will we hard fork? What will hard forks bring us?
> ... No answers
>
> Less information = less trust.
>
> If we don't have a roadmap, no one will believe in Bitcoin Cash. We need to sort these things:
>
> Simple malleability fix / FlexTrans
> Remove OP_RETURN anti-replay rule
> Better difficulty adjustment
> Headers-first mining (Can you believe that this is a part of Bitcoin Classic's 2016 roadmap?)
> Dynamic blocksize
> Schnorr signatures
> Blockchain pruning (Can be optional, each node operator decides)
> Removing Asicboost (Least priority?)
> Forcing XThin / Compact Blocks
>
> Some inspired by: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-ml/2017-August/000075.html
>
> Can't we at least decide when will the first hard fork happen and what will it contain?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-ml/attachments/20170902/1692dc46/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bitcoin-ml mailing list