[Bitcoin-ml] Can we decide on a roadmap now?
nagai at protonmail.ch
Sun Sep 3 07:46:11 UTC 2017
> > Schnorr signatures
> Can I ask why?
> The difference is imo cosmetic
Faster transaction validation
(^= smaller fees)
(^= more privacy)
Here's an article about it: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/the-power-of-schnorr-the-signature-algorithm-to-increase-bitcoin-s-scale-and-privacy-1460642496/
Here's a list of Schnorr's ALL advantages: [https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/35351/](https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/35351/38618)
Bitcoincore.org article: https://bitcoincore.org/en/2017/03/23/schnorr-signature-aggregation/
Technical documentation: https://github.com/sipa/secp256k1/blob/968e2f415a5e764d159ee03e95815ea11460854e/src/modules/schnorr/schnorr.md
Maybe we should add FlexTrans and Schnorr in the same hard fork when Schnorr is ready, making the transaction size much smaller?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-ml