[Bitcoin-ml] Can we decide on a roadmap now?
jkl at torus.ch
Mon Sep 4 21:16:33 UTC 2017
I have to say I did not know about the idea of permissionless development.
I will have to read about it more.
I'm wondering about the following statement
> * your idea is useless without running code.
How do you see non developers, or the ones not yet ready to change code on
the current clients, to be integrated in the permissionless development
On Mon, September 4, 2017 10:40 pm, Tomas via bitcoin-ml wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017, at 16:27, Tom Zander via bitcoin-ml wrote:
>> A roadmap requires;
>> * all teams agree beforehand.
>> * a direction is chosen before code is written. (excluding all others)
>> * waterfall development.
>> The idea of permissionless development is the absolute opposite.
>> * you need to convince nobody before you start work
>> * your idea is useless without running code.
>> * agreement is created based on actual work done. No high-level
>> disagreements based on misunderstandings. The code is your guide.
>> * development is iterative and there is no need for teams to "join"
>> they find the project to be serious enough to conribute to. Which can be
> Very well said Tom. I couldn't agree more.
> Mailing list, pre-implementation discussion is useful to:
> A. Gather input on incomplete ideas.
> B. Test the enthusiasm on ideas before wasting time on them.
> But attempting to agree on a roadmap here in a multi implementation
> network is not useful.
> We should instead strive that every change that effects other
> implementation (aka a change of rules) is as small and atomic as
> possible, and implemented independently even if discussion is still in
> bitcoin-ml mailing list
> bitcoin-ml at lists.linuxfoundation.org
More information about the bitcoin-ml