[Bitcoin-segwit2x] September/October SegWit2x Status Update

Alex Morcos morcos at gmail.com
Fri Nov 3 18:41:00 UTC 2017


Oh good god people.  
He’s too busy volunteering his time teaching future devs right now to respond to the emails.  
It obviously was not a threat.  
That’s enough on the subject.  

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 3, 2017, at 2:37 PM, Matthew Clancy via Bitcoin-segwit2x <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> I found it creepy and condescending coming from an adult. The tone is reminiscent of the bully in the schoolyard who gets angry when the other kids don't want to play with him because he makes up rules as he goes along. 
> 
> Bitcoin is HIS ball, and if you don't want to play by his rules, he's going to take the ball and go home. 
> 
> He needs you to be careful so we all can keep playing.
> 
>> On Nov 3, 2017 11:26 AM, "Phillip Katete via Bitcoin-segwit2x" <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> The person that used the phrase commonly known to be a veiled threat can categorically state it was not a threat, but thus far has not. This blunt threat is made in the wake of several high profile backers of the SegWit2x upgrade receiving death threats and the apologists vouching for him as “a decent chap” notwithstanding having made this blunt threat, can (and should) be assumed to number amongst the sharp edge of the that threat. You are all culpable in this stupidity.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Ben Peters
>> Sent: 03 November 2017 18:10
>> To: Phillip Katete
>> Cc: Marcel Jamin; John Newbery; bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] September/October SegWit2x Status Update
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> @Phillip,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I don’t see why it should be taken as a threat, and John is a decent chap as far as I know. My assumption is that he is simply concerned because he and others put a lot of work into the 0.15 update, don’t want to see that negated, and is probably concerned about issues that might arise should S2X succeed in its mission. I’m also assuming that Jeff and others have weighed the pros and cons appropriately (I certainly hope so, as I don’t have the time or knowledge to do so myself).
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/attachments/20171103/0fbb11ae/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list