[Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still happening?
pekatete at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 12 17:00:06 UTC 2017
Whatever he may say he agreed to, the facts are that he voted to activate and lock-in SegWit2x on bit 4 (before voting on bit 1 to get the legacy clients activated and locked-in too).
Despite the sabre rattling, f2pool will end up on the majority chain as they are not in the space to prop up core.
From: Brian Hoffman via Bitcoin-segwit2x<mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: 12 October 2017 16:56
To: Peter BitcoinReminder.com<mailto:segwit2x_mailinglist at bitcoinreminder.com>; Peter Todd via Bitcoin-segwit2x<mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still happening?
Where have you been? Wang Chun has said they never were agreed to NYA post segwit so what’s your point exactly?
It’s obvious that there will be a chain split at this point.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:53 AM Peter BitcoinReminder.com via Bitcoin-segwit2x <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org<mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
I was just pointing out that F2Pool just stopped NYA signaling some hours ago - which is a new information.
And still nobody answered my question if you know acknowledge that there will be a chain split for sure and you are intentionally splitting off?
Am 12.10.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Jeff Garzik <jeff at bloq.com<mailto:jeff at bloq.com>>:
It is information over a month old. See counter.
Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org<mailto:Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x