[Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still happening?

Phillip Katete pekatete at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 12 18:57:28 UTC 2017


That link contains the word “safelinks” and it triggers alarms for me but having read a few of your postings elsewhere, I trust the link even less.
But I suppose we better limit posts to tech discussion (as the handbags have already started flying).

From: Dr Adam Back<mailto:adam at blockstream.com>
Sent: 12 October 2017 19:06
To: Phillip Katete<mailto:pekatete at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still happening?

To understand more about mining economics and the creation vs
verification mechanism between miners and nodes, I recommend this
article by Prof Emin Sirer which explains it quite clearly.

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhackingdistributed.com%2F2016%2F01%2F03%2Ftime-for-bitcoin-user-voice%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cpekatete%40hotmail.com%7Ce59f79fd56bf4c5b6b2108d5119bff26%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636434284047243812&sdata=vmHa78wd%2BIZzrO6hH6ap5654%2BSDlXu3FGTNScKRWDQg%3D&reserved=0

Adam

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Phillip Katete via Bitcoin-segwit2x
<bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Whatever he may say he agreed to, the facts are that he voted to activate
> and lock-in SegWit2x on bit 4 (before voting on bit 1 to get the legacy
> clients activated and locked-in too).
>
> Despite the sabre rattling, f2pool will end up on the majority chain as they
> are not in the space to prop up core.
>
>
>
> From: Brian Hoffman via Bitcoin-segwit2x
> Sent: 12 October 2017 16:56
> To: Peter BitcoinReminder.com; Peter Todd via Bitcoin-segwit2x
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still
> happening?
>
>
>
> Where have you been? Wang Chun has said they never were agreed to NYA post
> segwit so what’s your point exactly?
>
>
>
> It’s obvious that there will be a chain split at this point.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:53 AM Peter BitcoinReminder.com via
> Bitcoin-segwit2x <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I was just pointing out that F2Pool just stopped NYA signaling some hours
> ago - which is a new information.
>
>
>
> And still nobody answered my question if you know acknowledge that there
> will be a chain split for sure and you are intentionally splitting off?
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 12.10.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Jeff Garzik <jeff at bloq.com>:
>
>
>
> It is information over a month old. See counter.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.linuxfoundation.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fbitcoin-segwit2x&data=02%7C01%7Cpekatete%40hotmail.com%7Ce59f79fd56bf4c5b6b2108d5119bff26%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636434284047243812&sdata=qUYCDGIAGw7y1%2Fsskts%2F0SBdhzqyWDsldjkufCQMsXA%3D&reserved=0
>
> --
>
> Brian Hoffman
>
> President
>
> OB1
>
> (571) 205-4967
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.linuxfoundation.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fbitcoin-segwit2x&data=02%7C01%7Cpekatete%40hotmail.com%7Ce59f79fd56bf4c5b6b2108d5119bff26%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636434284047243812&sdata=qUYCDGIAGw7y1%2Fsskts%2F0SBdhzqyWDsldjkufCQMsXA%3D&reserved=0
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/attachments/20171012/0c0b20d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list