[Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still happening?

John Heathco jheathco at gmail.com
Thu Oct 12 20:34:36 UTC 2017


While we are on the topic of hypotheticals, we should also consider what 1x
plans to do if >51% hashing power on that chain begins mining empty
blocks.  I do not condone the practice, but it is a major (and realistic)
threat.

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:31 PM John Heathco <jheathco at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't believe there is an explicitly stated hashpower in which the fork
> would be "called off", but I would assume it is much lower than what is
> currently signaling, even if we make the (unwise) assumption that F2Pool
> would not contribute to mining 2x whatsoever.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:57 PM Peter BitcoinReminder.com via
> Bitcoin-segwit2x <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> I’m not Peter Todd, we just share the same (nice) firstname.
>>
>> I still didn’t get an answer what the minimum amount of hashpower is
>> required, before the fork is getting delayed?
>> We have to plan time for the whole security measures etc, so I think it’s
>> reasonable to get more information about this?
>>
>>
>> Am 12.10.2017 um 21:53 schrieb bitPico <bitpico at icloud.com>:
>>
>> Without you knowing why they stopped signaling this is FUD and off-topic
>> for this list. Please instead let F2Pool  state their own opinion here
>> since yours doesn’t count. If you think your opinion does count then show
>> us your blocks that your pool has produced; until then you are simply an
>> end-user and still you are off-topic for this list. If you need ELI5 for
>> how this list works please let us know and we can help you Peter Todd.
>>
>> Have a groovy day!
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Peter BitcoinReminder.com
>> <http://bitcoinreminder.com/> via Bitcoin-segwit2x <
>> bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Since F2Pool stopped signaling for the NYA[1] and slush also mines mostly
>> non-NYA blocks, are you still going to fork off in November - splitting the
>> chain intentionally?
>>
>>>> [1] https://imgur.com/LgYdFKw
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/attachments/20171012/6eca3f86/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list