[Bitcoin-segwit2x] We are all bitcoin
pekatete at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 14 14:32:05 UTC 2017
In the grand scheme of things, 1,168 responders is not exactly representative of the bitcoin community, is it? But that number, for a sample size, falls in the range of what is referred to as statistically irrelevant. It seems like you’ll have to do even more reading up!
From: Scott Roberts via Bitcoin-segwit2x<mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: 14 October 2017 15:25
To: bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org<mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] We are all bitcoin
> I have NEVER seen a twitter poll on bitcoin that had a statistically relevant sample size. But also bear in mind that by it’s very nature, twitter creates bubbles where like minded people follow each other.
1,168 with 30x difference in responses is very significant. Show me
the twitter bubble where like-minded SegWit2x supporters show their
Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x