[Bitcoin-segwit2x] We are all bitcoin

Phillip Katete pekatete at hotmail.com
Mon Oct 16 00:37:27 UTC 2017

In the same breath we can add that the consensus on the theoretical split (sans core HF) is that the split will result in an unusable legacy chain. This simple fact is borne out from verifiable signalling-intent on the blockchain

From: Chris Stewart<mailto:chris at suredbits.com>
Sent: 16 October 2017 01:20
To: Phillip Katete<mailto:pekatete at hotmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Error Log<mailto:bitcoinerrorlog at gmail.com>; Mike Belshe<mailto:mike at bitgo.com>; bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org<mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] We are all bitcoin

>The terns of reference for the working group, as has been stated multiple times, is to avoid a network split.
If there is consensus on one thing, I think we can all admit there is going to be a network split.

Therefore, if this working group insists on creating an altcoin, it should have strong 2 way replay protection.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/attachments/20171016/25ad68ed/attachment.html>

More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list