[Bitcoin-segwit2x] We are all bitcoin

Vinny Lingham vinny at civic.com
Mon Oct 16 05:27:26 UTC 2017

To put it more bluntly, RP means that the agreement will fall apart so asking for 2-way RP is akin to asking for it to end.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 15, 2017, at 22:19, Cedrick Perrigo via Bitcoin-segwit2x <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This has been stated hundreds of times -- strong two-way RP won't happen on the segwit2x Bitcoin chain.
> Chris, do you understand how human interaction works? Segwit2x working group owe you nothing. The thing you proposed only help yourself, but not the broader segwit2x Bitcoin community. It's just like you ask some random person on a street to give you one million dollars, and complain why they refuse to do so or even talk to you.
> Stop begging.
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] We are all bitcoin
>> Local Time: October 16, 2017 8:19 AM
>> UTC Time: October 16, 2017 12:19 AM
>> From: bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> To: Phillip Katete <pekatete at hotmail.com>
>> bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> >The terns of reference for the working group, as has been stated multiple times, is to avoid a network split.
>> If there is consensus on one thing, I think we can all admit there is going to be a network split. 
>> Therefore, if this working group insists on creating an altcoin, it should have strong 2 way replay protection. 
>> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/attachments/20171015/f3d10828/attachment.html>

More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list