[Bitcoin-segwit2x] PROPOSAL: B0RG (Bitcoin zero replay guarantee) - Ensuring a smooth 2X upgrade without a chain split

Jared Lee Richardson jaredr26 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 24 14:04:24 UTC 2017


Per longtime major Core Developers, upgrades to Bitcoin (which this
is) do not need replay protection, nor should they have it:

https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/status/921944291777437697



On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Bitcoin Error Log via
Bitcoin-segwit2x <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> All of the exchanges and the community have conceded that this fork will
> result in two coins. They all decided to name the new one B2X.
>
> There is no longer any reason to entertain the illusion of everyone
> migrating, thus you are obligated to include strong replay protection at
> this point. Otherwise you are choosing to be hostile and if you cause loss,
> you may expose yourself to risks or recourse.
>
> Thank you for understanding, I look forward to everyone playing nicely
> together, as appropriate.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:06 AM robtcspierre via Bitcoin-segwit2x
> <bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can this proposal be done using merged mining?
>>
>>
>> As far as I can see, only by hard forking btc1 once more.  The B0RG
>> proposal has the advantage of being just a soft fork.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> robtcspierre
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
>
> --
>
> John C
> Bitcoin Error Log
> www.bitcoinerrorlog.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list
> Bitcoin-segwit2x at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x
>


More information about the Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list