[Bridge] Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error

[chas williams - CONTRACTOR]

In message <20050316181532.GA3251 at stusta.de>,Adrian Bunk writes:
>Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good 
>idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM 
>support.

i agree.

>Moving the hooks to the bridge code will give you exactly the same 
>problems the other way round.

how about moving them to a third location like net/core/dev.c?