[Bridge] Query on Sapnning tree implementation from standard point of view
Sujata Verma
sujataverma3 at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 15 12:25:39 UTC 2012
Thanks. I was doing the same experiment on few switches, i could get hold of and this is the result:
Cisco Switch catalyst 2950 : Completely ignoring the packet, so validations are proper.
Netgear FSM726V3 : Hello timer is validated and is propagated as 10 instead of 255 ( which i sent) other max age and forward delay still it accepts as 255.
DLINK-DES-3026 : No validation done and accepts all as 255 ( max age, forward delay and hello timer)
In both Netgear and Dlink the message age is changed to 16, which i am not sure why it has happened ?
my setup is simple
PC1------Switch------PC2
More information about the Bridge
mailing list