[Bridge] [RFC PATCH 2/2] bridge: export multicast database via netlink

[Cong Wang]

On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 11:59 +0000, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 11/27/12 at 05:49pm, Cong Wang wrote:
> > +static int br_rports_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
> > +			       u32 seq, struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +	struct net_bridge_port *p;
> > +	struct hlist_node *n;
> > +	struct nlattr *nest, *nest2;
> > +
> > +	if (!br->multicast_router || hlist_empty(&br->router_list)) {
> > +		printk(KERN_INFO "no router on bridge\n");
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	nest = nla_nest_start(skb, MDBA_ROUTER);
> > +	if (nest == NULL)
> > +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> > +	nest2 = nla_nest_start(skb, MDBA_MDB_BRPORT);
> > +	if (nest2 == NULL)
> > +		goto fail;
> > +
> > +	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, n, &br->router_list, rlist) {
> > +		if (p && nla_put_u16(skb, MDBA_BRPORT_NO, p->port_no)) {
> > +			nla_nest_cancel(skb, nest2);
> > +			goto fail;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	nla_nest_end(skb, nest2);
> > +	nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
> 
> I would simplify the MDBA_ROUTER attribute to a u16[len(br->router_list)]. If
> we ever need something more complex we can retire the MDBA_ROUTER
> attribute and replace it with something newer.

Makes sense, will do.

I wanted to reserve some for adding new attributes to MDBA_ROUTER, but
so far it is not necessary.

> 
> > +	nest = nla_nest_start(skb, MDBA_MDB);
> > +	if (nest == NULL)
> > +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < mdb->max; i++) {
> > +		struct hlist_node *h;
> > +		struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp;
> > +		struct net_bridge_port_group *p, **pp;
> > +		struct net_bridge_port *port;
> > +
> > +		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mp, h, &mdb->mhash[i], hlist[mdb->ver]) {
> > +			if (nla_put_be32(skb, MDBA_MDB_MCADDR, mp->addr.u.ip4))
> > +				goto fail;
> > +
> > +			nest2 = nla_nest_start(skb, MDBA_MDB_BRPORT);
> > +			if (nest2 == NULL)
> > +				goto fail;
> 
> What if you can't fit all theh hash entries into a single netlink
> message? You need to allow splitting theh hash across multiple
> messages. Therefore I suggest that you add a container attribute
> for each mdb_entry like this:
> 
> MDBA_MDB = {
>   1 = {
>     MDBA_MDB_MCADDR = { ... },
>     MDBA_MDB_BRPORT = { ... },
>   },
>   2 = {
>     MDBA_MDB_MCADDR = { ... },
>     MDBA_MDB_BR_PORT = { ... },
>   },
>   [...]
> }

I thought the user-space will reassemble multiple-part messages, but I
probably misunderstand this...

Actually I was trying to reduce the size of the netlink message. :)

> 
> > +static int br_mdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > +{
> > +	struct net_device *dev;
> > +	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> > +	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
> > +	u32 seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
> > +	int idx = 0, s_idx;
> > +
> > +	s_idx = cb->args[0];
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	cb->seq = net->dev_base_seq;
> 
> Using RCU read lock is OK but that means you must be prepared to
> handle additions/removals to the table between dump iterations
> and thus you must introduce a seq counter bumped on each table
> change and add it to the dev_base_seq above.

Yeah, as you told me before. I will make another patch for this. Thanks
for reminding!

> 
> > +	for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) {
> > +		if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE) {
> > +			struct br_port_msg *bpm;
> > +
> > +			if (idx < s_idx)
> > +				goto cont;
> > +
> > +			nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
> > +					seq, RTM_GETMDB,
> > +					sizeof(*bpm), NLM_F_MULTI);
> > +			if (nlh == NULL)
> > +				break;
> > +
> > +			bpm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> > +			bpm->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> > +			if (br_mdb_fill_info(skb, cb, seq, dev) < 0) {
> > +				printk(KERN_INFO "br_mdb_fill_info failed\n");
> > +				goto fail;
> 
> As stated above I believe that you should allow for hashtable to be
> split across multiple messages so you need to store the hash table
> offset as well and properly finalize and send the message on error
> here.

You mean saving the offset into cb->args[1]?

Thanks!