[Bridge] bridge is not forwaring ICMP6 neighbor solicitation to KVM guest

[Linus Lüssing]

Hi Jan,

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:47:15PM -0500, Jan Stancek wrote:
> I'm seeing an issue where bridge (sometimes) stops forwarding ICMP6
> neighbor solicitation packets to KVM guest and as result KVM guest doesn't
> respond with neighbor advertisement.

Hm, okay, that's not supposed to happen.

> The reason I think this packet is related is because when I send same exact
> packet I'm often hitting same issue - bridge stops forwarding ICMP6 neigh.
> solicitation packets to KVM guest.

Yes, the MLD query is kicking the multicast snooping into gear. If
there's never a query, then snooping is basically disabled
(compare: "bridge: disable snooping if there is no querier").

> 
> My current way to reproduce this is:
> 0. host B IP / MAC is: 2620:52:0:1040:221:5aff:fe47:931c / 00:21:5a:47:93:1c
>    guest IP / MAC is: 2620:52:0:1040:5056:ff:fe00:29 / 52:56:00:00:00:29
> 1. host B is sending neigh solicit packets every 5 seconds with KVM guest IP
>    using ns6 from ipv6toolkit: http://www.si6networks.com/tools/ipv6toolkit/
>    with parameters:
>    --src-address=2620:52:0:1040:221:5aff:fe47:931c --dst-address=ff02::1:ff00:0029
>    -t 2620:52:0:1040:5056:ff:fe00:29 --link-src-address=00:21:5a:47:93:1c
>    --source-lla-opt=00:21:5a:47:93:1c --link-dst-address=33:33:ff:00:00:29
>    tcpdump running on guest can see both solicit and advertisement packets
> 2. wait ~5 minutes
> 3. host B sends Multicast Listener Query packet described above
> 4. tcpdump running on guest is no longer seeing any neigh solicit packets

Just to clarify, host B is behind eno1 and vnet0 is directly
connected to the interface of the guest, no additional bridge or
anything else on top of that, right?

Would it be possible for you to upload the tcpdumps from host B
(or if you can't tcpdump on host B, then capturing on eno1)
and the guest somewhere and saying at which time/packet in the dumps
it stops working (probably ~10 seconds after the query). Filtering
for ICMPv6 should be sufficient. 

What I'm curious about is, whether the guest receives
the MLD query and responds with an MLD report. I suspect that
either the bridge doesn't get an MLD report and therefore is
shutting down the according port or there's a bug in parsing the
MLD report in the bridge code.


Thanks for the detailed report so far!

Cheers, Linus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20140303/d6043ba0/attachment-0001.sig>