[Bridge] [PATCH 3/3] bridge: fix bridge root block on designated port
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Thu Mar 13 22:16:23 UTC 2014
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:15:27 -0700
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof at do-not-panic.com> wrote:
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
> u8 priority;
> u8 state;
> u16 port_no;
> + bool root_block_enabled;
> unsigned char topology_change_ack;
It seems a bit confusing to have both a ROOT_BLOCK flag in the
data structure and and additional root_block_enabled flag.
If nothing else it is a waste of space.
Looks like you are changing the meaning slightly. is possible
to have BR_ROOT_BLOCK set but !root_block_enabled? and what about
the inverse?
More information about the Bridge
mailing list